Gemini 3 Pro vs GPT-5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5: The Ultimate 2025 LLM Showdown
Google's Gemini 3 Pro crushes 19/20 benchmarks against Claude 4.5 and GPT-5.1. See real performance data, pricing, and developer feedback from November 2025.
Breaking: Gemini 3 Dominates November 2025 Benchmarks
On November 18, 2025—just six days after OpenAI released GPT-5.1—Google dropped Gemini 3 Pro and immediately claimed the crown. According to independent testing, Gemini 3 achieved the top score in 19 out of 20 standard benchmarks when tested against Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5.1.
But does that make it the best model for your use case? This comprehensive analysis breaks down real performance data, pricing, and developer feedback to help you decide.
All benchmark data in this article is sourced from official releases, independent testing (TechRadar, The Algorithmic Bridge), and verified developer reports from November 2025.
The Big Three: At a Glance
| Feature | Gemini 3 Pro (Google) | GPT-5.1 (OpenAI) | Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Release Date | November 18, 2025 | November 12, 2025 | September 2025 |
| Benchmark Wins | 19/20 vs competitors | Competitive across most | Strong in coding & agents |
| Context Window | 1 Million Tokens | 400K Tokens | 200K Tokens |
| API Pricing | Not disclosed yet | Not disclosed | $3 / $15 per million tokens |
| Multimodal | Audio, Image, Video (native) | Image (native) | Image (native) |
| Best For | Large-scale data, screen understanding | General reasoning, ecosystem | Software engineering, agents |
Benchmark Showdown: Who Really Wins?
ARC-AGI-2: The "IQ Test" for AI
This benchmark tests abstract reasoning—the closest thing we have to an AI "IQ test."
| Model | ARC-AGI-2 Score | Improvement over Predecessor |
|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3 Pro | 31.1% | +523% vs Gemini 2.5 Pro (4.9%) |
| GPT-5.1 | ~25% (estimated) | Unknown |
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | ~23% (estimated) | Unknown |
Source: The Algorithmic Bridge, November 2025
What this means: Gemini 3's massive leap suggests a fundamental breakthrough in reasoning capabilities, not just incremental improvements.
Overall Benchmark Performance
According to TechRadar's comprehensive testing:
"Google Gemini 3.0 vs ChatGPT 5.1 and Claude Sonnet 4.5: Why Gemini Took the Lead in Real-World Coding"
Gemini 3 Pro scored the highest in 19 out of 20 benchmarks, including:
- Mathematical reasoning (MATH benchmark)
- Graduate-level knowledge (GPQA)
- Code generation (HumanEval)
- Visual understanding (Screen Spot Pro)
Winner: Gemini 3 Pro (by a significant margin)
Real-World Testing: Coding Tasks
TechRadar conducted hands-on coding tests with all three models. Here's what they found:
Test: Build a Full-Stack React App
Task: "Create a React + Node.js app that fetches GitHub repository data and displays commit history with sentiment analysis."
Gemini 3 Pro Performance
- Time to working code: 90 seconds
- Bugs on first run: 0
- Code quality: "Crushed it" (TechRadar's words)
- Verdict: Production-ready, no edits needed
GPT-5.1 Performance
- Time to working code: 120 seconds
- Bugs on first run: 2 (API endpoint, React hooks)
- Code quality: Functional but required debugging
- Verdict: Good, but needed iteration
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Performance
- Time to working code: 100 seconds
- Bugs on first run: 1 (environment variable handling)
- Code quality: Clean, well-structured
- Verdict: Reliable and predictable (developer favorite)
Source: TechRadar, "I tested Gemini 3, ChatGPT 5.1, and Claude Sonnet 4.5 – and Gemini crushed it in a real coding task," November 2025
Winner for coding speed: Gemini 3 Pro Winner for developer experience: Claude Sonnet 4.5 (most stable, predictable)
Developer Feedback: What the Community Says
Claude Sonnet 4.5: The Reliable Workhorse
From independent developer surveys:
"Claude 4.5 is the most stable and predictable model for coding. It follows instructions closely and makes small, non-destructive edits."
Best for:
- Production codebases (where bugs = $$$)
- Complex refactoring tasks
- Agentic workflows (autonomous coding)
Gemini 3 Pro: The Speed Demon
"Gemini 3 is fast—sometimes too fast. It can generate working code in seconds, but occasionally makes assumptions about your stack."
Best for:
- Prototyping and MVPs
- High-volume code generation
- Multimodal tasks (reading screenshots, diagrams)
GPT-5.1: The Ecosystem King
"GPT-5.1 is still the best all-rounder. The third-party integrations and plugins give it an edge for real-world workflows."
Best for:
- Teams already invested in the OpenAI ecosystem
- Complex multi-step reasoning
- General-purpose tasks
Pricing Comparison (Where Available)
Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Confirmed Pricing)
| Tier | Input Cost | Output Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard API | $3 / million tokens | $15 / million tokens | Most common |
| Batch API | $1.50 / million | $7.50 / million | 50% discount, 24-hour processing |
| Prompt Caching | $0.30 / million | N/A | 90% savings on cached inputs |
Source: Anthropic Pricing Documentation, November 2025
Example cost for 1 million API calls:
- Input: 1,000 tokens × 1M calls = 1 billion tokens → $3,000
- Output: 500 tokens × 1M calls = 500M tokens → $7,500
- Total: $10,500/month
Gemini 3 Pro & GPT-5.1
Pricing not yet publicly disclosed as of November 26, 2025. Historically, Google and OpenAI have priced flagship models similarly to Anthropic's range.
Context Window: The Long Document Battle
| Model | Context Window | Real-World Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3 Pro | 1,000,000 tokens (~7,000 pages) | Maintains quality across full context |
| GPT-5.1 | 400,000 tokens (~2,800 pages) | Strong within limit |
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 200,000 tokens (~1,400 pages) | Excellent quality, premium pricing for >200K |
Use case winner:
- Legal contracts, codebases: Gemini 3 Pro (1M context)
- Most business documents: Claude Sonnet 4.5 (200K is sufficient + best quality)
Multimodal Capabilities
Gemini 3 Pro: Native Audio, Video, Screen Understanding
Gemini 3 excels at Screen Spot Pro benchmarks, scoring "far ahead of competitors" in understanding graphical interfaces.
Real-world capability: Can watch a video of someone using software and write code to replicate it.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 & GPT-5.1: Image Understanding
Both support image inputs but lack native audio/video understanding.
Winner for multimodal: Gemini 3 Pro (by a landslide)
The Verdict: Which Model for Your Use Case?
Choose Gemini 3 Pro if:
- You need blazing-fast code generation for prototypes
- You're processing massive context (full codebases, legal documents)
- Your application requires screen/video understanding
- You don't mind being an "early adopter" (released Nov 18, 2025)
Choose GPT-5.1 if:
- You value ecosystem integrations (plugins, third-party tools)
- You need balanced, general-purpose performance
- Your team is already trained on OpenAI workflows
- You prioritize stability over cutting-edge features
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 if:
- You're working on production software where bugs = revenue loss
- You need predictable, stable code generation
- You're building AI agents for complex automation
- You value developer experience over raw speed
Real-World Recommendations
| Use Case | Top Choice | Runner-Up |
|---|---|---|
| Startup MVP (speed critical) | Gemini 3 Pro | GPT-5.1 |
| Enterprise software (reliability critical) | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | GPT-5.1 |
| Data analysis (huge documents) | Gemini 3 Pro | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
| General business workflows | GPT-5.1 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
What About Claude 5?
Anthropic historically releases major versions 8-10 months apart. Given Claude Sonnet 4.5 launched in September 2025, we estimate:
Claude 5 ETA: Q2-Q3 2026
Predicted improvements:
- Near-AGI reasoning (approaching ARC-AGI-2 50%+)
- 500K-1M token context window
- Even stronger agentic capabilities
Subscribe to get instant alerts when Claude 5 benchmarks leak.
Data Sources & Verification
Primary Sources:
- TechRadar: "I tested Gemini 3, ChatGPT 5.1, and Claude Sonnet 4.5 – and Gemini crushed it" (November 2025)
- The Algorithmic Bridge: "Google Gemini 3 Is the Best Model Ever" (November 2025)
- Anthropic Pricing Documentation: https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/about-claude/pricing
- Vertu: "Gemini 3 vs GPT-5 vs Claude 4.5: The Ultimate Reasoning Performance Battle" (November 2025)
Benchmark Verification:
- ARC-AGI-2 scores: Official ARC challenge leaderboard
- Coding tests: Reproduced by TechRadar with public repositories
- Developer feedback: Aggregated from Reddit r/LocalLLaMA, Hacker News (November 2025)
Last Updated: November 26, 2025
Disclaimer: Model performance can vary based on specific tasks and prompting strategies. Always test with your own use cases before committing to a platform.